tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4781727111866727703.post6820769551362203137..comments2024-03-18T22:54:30.699-07:00Comments on <em>Archimago's Musings</em>: MUSINGS: End of 2016 - Video Encoding (HEVC 10-bits, the HDR "Trinity"), Multichannel Streaming, and Other Thoughts...Archimagohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08642574001287787545noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4781727111866727703.post-470999724898904492018-12-28T18:36:26.171-08:002018-12-28T18:36:26.171-08:00I’m not sure where you are getting your info, but ...<br />I’m not sure where you are getting your info, but good topic. I needs to spend some time learning much more or understanding more. Thanks for wonderful information I was looking for this information for my mission.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.eagle-touch.com/open-frame/" rel="nofollow">Open Frame Touch Monitor</a>Hillhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18368099545751776581noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4781727111866727703.post-58304487727831848592017-06-04T14:40:08.599-07:002017-06-04T14:40:08.599-07:00Another update as I came back to this to reference...Another update as I came back to this to reference something;<br /><br />The bug in x265 that prevented it from working with Don Melton's scripts has been long fixed and works now (assuming you are running a platform that works with the DLL you reference above), although the bitrate the script target are still geared for x264. Rather than tinker looking for a lower bitrate which delivers theklogghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15034440939844584570noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4781727111866727703.post-69405243756858915332016-12-26T18:08:00.930-08:002016-12-26T18:08:00.930-08:00Hi!
It's nice to see how video enconding is e...Hi!<br /><br />It's nice to see how video enconding is evolving. But i'll wait at least 5 more years until i jump on the 4k/HDR bandwagon (the system is too immature for me - the guys of Digital Foundry in YouTube made a video about the confusing HDR settings, even in good TV's).<br /><br />About the compression, it is really silly to say that MP3 320k sounds bad. It all depends on VKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05287837050338339500noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4781727111866727703.post-74595422695348140132016-12-26T09:34:28.114-08:002016-12-26T09:34:28.114-08:00Just posted a little comparison / discussion on th...Just posted a little comparison / discussion on this...<br />http://archimago.blogspot.com/2016/12/quick-compare-avc-vs-hevc-8-bit-vs-10.htmlArchimagohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08642574001287787545noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4781727111866727703.post-13099260433026388762016-12-25T00:47:43.780-08:002016-12-25T00:47:43.780-08:00Hello!
You could be right. Interesting comment abo...Hello!<br />You could be right. Interesting comment about higher bitrate and retention of details in AVC vs. HEVC.<br /><br />In some simple testing I have done at low bitrates to bring out imperfections, I have noticed however that 10-bit x265 HEVC compared to 8-bit encoding does seem to reduce quantization effects even with an 8-bit AVC source while maintaining a constant bitrate. I'll see Archimagohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08642574001287787545noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4781727111866727703.post-17680688159943561002016-12-25T00:35:03.267-08:002016-12-25T00:35:03.267-08:00Very cool klogg!
I didn't know about the scrip...Very cool klogg!<br />I didn't know about the script so very happy that you dropped the tip... Didn't seem commercially at all. Amazing all the work folks have put in and fantastic that it's all freely available.<br /><br />Merry Christmas...<br />Archimagohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08642574001287787545noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4781727111866727703.post-64064965462726422772016-12-24T04:33:18.819-08:002016-12-24T04:33:18.819-08:00AFAIK, h264 High10 showed gain in quality just bec...AFAIK, h264 High10 showed gain in quality just because in the standard they didn't pay attention to rounding between encoding steps, which caused additional losses. Using higher bit depth "fixed" that for h264. <br /><br />OTOH, in h265 they addressed this and using higher bit depth for 8 bit source won't gain you anything - actually you could loose quality (and speed) because Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07289982605104703967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4781727111866727703.post-80075459144373177412016-12-23T13:00:37.647-08:002016-12-23T13:00:37.647-08:00That sounds extra commercially, probably should no...That sounds extra commercially, probably should not have just right into the meat of it, ah well, still very cool work even if I sound like a spambot.klogghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15034440939844584570noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4781727111866727703.post-18098018619629851602016-12-23T12:59:30.008-08:002016-12-23T12:59:30.008-08:00Hi,
Long time lurker, first time commentor. :-)
I...Hi,<br /><br />Long time lurker, first time commentor. :-)<br />I have spent a good chunk of time digging into transcoding this year too, during my research I stumbled across Don Melton's handbrake automation scripts which do a couple of key things;<br /><br />- hyper focused on quality versus file size using handbrakeCLI<br />- better automation and batching (again, because the CLI version klogghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15034440939844584570noreply@blogger.com