So you've no doubt seen this device at the local electronics store like Best Buy. It's part of the second generation line of Chromecast devices, the Chromecast Audio released late 2015 (the other one being the HDMI video-enabled Chromecast itself). At a list price of US$35 (CAD$45), this is clearly the least expensive ways to stream audio off one's phone or other compatible network enabled server. Remember, this light, plastic puck-like device doesn't have much in the way of "intelligence" built-in which is why it needs to be connected to an actual streaming device that will basically "push" the audio data to it, either from a local server or link it with a cloud-based music source. Effectively, this is a basic "audio renderer".
When you initially point your WiFi enabled phone/tablet/laptop at "chromecast.com/setup", it will find the Chromecast Audio at which point you will enter the settings which are saved into the Chromecast Audio so it logs into your home network - worked for me without a hitch... There's a little white LED that lights up when it's ready.Very intuitive install procedure!
If you use a Windows computer, the app will look something like this:
|Selection of network settings...
|Scroll down a bit... A few Chromecast Audio settings like HDR as well as firmware ID.
Thereafter, stream away with Chromecast enabled apps/programs. Note that for best quality "bit perfect" streaming, I agree with this Computer Audiophile post to use Plex from my server computer connected to my ethernet. I then would use the Plex control app from my Android cell phone. For these tests, I'll just focus on casting through a music library on Plex running on my Windows Server 2012 R2 machine, using the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 for Plex controls. The WiFi router in my home is the Netgear R7000 which is running DD-WRT firmware - very stable with a current uptime of >100 days.
Another server option that's worth looking into is CastBridge for all you Logitech Media Server / Squeezebox users. As the Squeezebox devices age, this could be a very inexpensive replacement! So far, I haven't had time to investigate how well CastBridge works (and with a Squeezebox Touch replacement stowed away for backup, probably will not worry about it in quite awhile!).
Tip: For those running into issues with the "Can't play a sideloaded song remotely" error if you're trying to just cast from a local music folder on your Android phone with the standard Play Music app, what you have to do is go to the Chromecast app, tap the top left triple-line icon --> Cast screen / audio --> select the device to cast to --> CAST SCREEN / AUDIO button. From here just go back to the music player app and start playing. Note that casting from a phone in this way would not result in best sound quality as the audio is run through lossy compression to stream based on some quick testing. I hear that the app AllCast works as well. I'm sure there are other solutions out there...
Check out the teardown of the Chromecast Audio here. We see that the DAC inside is the AKM 4430 chip, a reasonable budget chip with rated dynamic range of 104dB. It is capable of 192kHz but realistically speaking, 24/192 over WiFi could be hit-or-miss depending on signal strength; probably best to not support this to prevent too many complaints. There's 2Gbit of RAM (250MB) in there, so probably a good amount of buffer space available to avoid buffer under-runs. Presumably the embedded OS running on the Marvell ARMADA 1500 dual-core 1.3GHz Cortex A7 processor will be very memory efficient. The interesting thing is that this Chromecast Audio is using the same processor as its video-enabled sibling. Considering the lower processing demands of audio, that's quite a bit of speed under the hood...
Now of course, for high-fidelity purposes, best practice would be streaming through the digital output to an outboard DAC to maximize sound quality. But before looking at the digital output in Part II, let's see what this AKM 4430 DAC-based analogue output can do...
I. Output impedance, 1kHz Square Wave, Impulse Response and Digital Filter CompositeThe analogue output is a stereo 3.5mm standard headphone jack. Indeed, you can just plug in some headphones and stream music from your device using the volume control. Using a 1kHz sine wave and a 20-ohm load, I measured an output impedance of 34.5-ohms. Clearly this is high and not meant to be used with the typical low-impedance headphones these days. Not a problem when plugged into a preamp of course.
Let us now have a peek at the 1kHz 0dBFS square wave:
That looks pretty good. I double checked with a sine wave to make sure there was no clipping. Peak of 2.8Vmax (or a good 2Vrms). Very nice channel balance.
A typical symmetrical linear phase filter with equal amounts of pre- and post-ringing. Notice that the phase is inverted.
Digital Filter Composite:
II. RightMark Tests & ComparisonsAlright, let's see how this thing performs with the audio test battery... As usual, I'll be using my E-MU 0404USB ADC for these measurements described many times over the years.
As per convention, let's start with the 16/44 test signal - important to make sure this is done "well":
Confirmation that the Chromecast Audio is capable of 16/44 with ease. As you can see, I've compared it with a number of other portable devices, the Light Harmonic Geek Out V2 DAC, as well as a couple Squeezebox streamers (Touch, and Transporter).
I've been measuring the 48kHz samplerate more these days with my portable devices. Also, as I have seen quite a number of 96kHz digital files being nothing more than upsampled 48kHz (or what looks like 48kHz material run through an analogue console), 48kHz has become more important to me since I routinely with downsample.
As you can see, the Chromecast Audio measures very well! It's achieving about 17.5-bits of resolution; clearly capable of benefiting from the extra dynamic range of 24-bit audio data.
As of the December 2015 firmware upgrade, the Chromecast can now handle 24/96 streaming.
What really separates itself from the pack here is of course the Logitech/Squeezebox Transporter; hardly fair given the price differential of course. But it does give the opportunity to compare objectively the range of capabilities between the different DACs and players as it applies to high-resolution audio.
|Frequency Response - note that the iPhone 6 resampled 96kHz signal. Of note, the Chromecast Audio is -1dB at 20kHz.
|IMD+N Sweep - again, the iPhone 6 is incapable of true 96kHz playback. Impressive result from the Transporter.
The Chromecast Audio failed to stream at 192kHz through Plex - as expected. There was no audio output at all.
As you can see, jitter is a non-issue even with a <$50 streaming device receiving the audio data off a WiFi network. For the sake of completeness, there are a pair of obvious sidebands evident in the 24-bit J-Test of very low level corresponding to +/-250Hz. In terms of amplitude, these are 115dB below the primary 12kHz signal! Absolutely irrelevant in ability to impact sound quality.
IV. SubjectiveLook, I can write all kinds of things about the music I listened to, etc... But I won't bore you and encourage you to have a listen yourself if interested in this device. Seriously, the analogue output sounds good; just don't plug some low impedance headphones into this thing and expect the best potential audio from it. Also, remember that it's best to use a dedicated streaming source like Plex Media Server for best quality. If you simply cast from your phone or tablet, you're likely sending a lossy and dynamically compressed signal (this is where the "High Dynamic Range" setting on the Chromecast could improve the sound quality).
The fact is I don't have a need for this device to act as a particularly high-fidelity source at the moment (I like having it for convenience) but I did listen to the analogue output for about 2 hours in my main stereo system one night - Emotiva XSP-1 preamp (RCA input, 47kohm input impedance), dual Emotiva XPA-1L amps, and Paradigm Signature S8v3 speakers with SUB 1 subwoofer. Sounds great, no harshness nor any obviously objectionable characteristic. Recently, I've been on an Asian music kick. Late last year, going through China and Hong Kong, I picked up a copy of Dadawa's Sister Drum (阿姐鼓, 1995). A Mandarin album consisting of New Age and Tibetan influences. Plenty of dynamics, excellent rendition of nuances, great tonality. On of the most important qualities I enjoy in a good DAC is the ability to render the "depth" of the recording and indeed the Chromecast sounded very good in portraying the "3D" characteristic of this album.
V. SummaryThis concludes Part I of a 2-part look at the Chromecast Audio. I had no issues at all with the setup. Remember that for best quality, I did set up Plex server for streaming to the device. As usual when streaming wirelessly through WiFi, make sure the signal strength is adequate, especially if you're going to be doing 24/96. I did not notice any issues with just 2.4GHz Wireless N on the main floor of my house with the router in the basement. Even upstairs where the signal strength dropped below 40%, I did not run into any issues. I suspect the Chromecast has a very good buffering system to prevent under-runs.
As for objective sound quality, honestly, I was impressed by what I'm seeing here. If much of this is the result of AKM's new generation of 44xx chips and the budget 4430 is of such high quality already, I'd imagine the AKM "Verita" AK4497EQ "flagship" should be objectively impressive! Of course the question is whether human ears would be able to appreciate the quality...
From a subjective perspective, what else does one really need? I would certainly have no qualms about using the analogue output from this remarkably economical device to feed a good stereo system.
One might ask the age-old question of whether the inverted phase as demonstrated by the impulse response makes any difference; I certainly do not believe I have ever heard a difference flipping polarity back and forth in the comfort of my listening chair with the Transporter (other than perhaps a slight "tick" at the point of the polarity switch). It's truly amazing when reading stories of audiophiles having customized settings for "correct" or even "absolute" polarity for each album they listen to (here's a strange and extremely long "Abstract")! I agree with J. Gordon Holt's article (Stereophile back in 1980) and suspect that it's only a factor if one's speakers have significant excursion nonlinearity; basically if one hears such a problem, the speakers are probably at fault and should be checked out for damage or maybe needs to be upgraded if there is an inherent issue. Of course, as usual, I am happy to be proven wrong if someone can provide an example to try...
Stay tuned for Part II as we have a look at the TosLink/optical digital output.
-------------------------Have a great week ahead everyone!